A systematic collection and analysis of scholarly publications related to Biacore technology in 2021 were conducted. Approximately 1,000 papers were retrieved and text excerpts featuring the term Biacore was extracted. To discern trends and distinctions between Biacore T200 and Biacore S200 instruments, categorization of the data was carried out. Text analysis techniques with the Scattertext library were employed to visualize linguistic patterns and word usage. The objective was to gain insights into language patterns and research themes associated with each instrument category and the broader dataset. This approach offered valuable insights into the scientific community's discourse and focus on these Biacore instruments in real world.

In general, the Biacore T200 is suitable for higher throughput experiments and a broader range of applications, making it well-suited for core facilities and research labs with diverse needs. The Biacore S200, while still versatile, is typically chosen for labs with lower throughput requirements or specific applications that do not require the higher throughput capabilities of the T200. The choice between these instruments depends on the specific research goals and experimental demands of the laboratory.

Top Trending of Biacore T200: t200 evaluation; 1:1; model; fitting; cm5; fit; t200 instrument; system; sensor; calculated; k; affinity measurements; performed using; 1:1 binding.

Top Trending of Biacore S200: prmt5; tagged; s1; resonance spr; s200; biacore s200; x100; biacore x100; coronavirus; argx-117; subunit; his; kinetic interactions; interactions antibodies.

Characteristic for Both Biacore T200 and S200: biacore; sensorgrams; carboxymethylated; pfkrs; bispecific; nanobody; affibody; plasmon; immunodominant; cynomolgus; nanobodies; streptavidin; luteolin; gpvi; immobilized; biosensor; lactosmart; biosimilar; dhodh; picomolar; bsab; spr; isotherm; affinities; coronavirus; dextran; maytansinoids; ampelopsis; grossedentata; farnesylate.